Identifying related keywords

Related keyphrases and keywords have a similar meaning or inference to your main keyphrases and keywords. There is reliable empirical evidence that Google and other search engines make increasing use of semantics in assessing the quality of a page for ranking purposes. A low quality web page, designed by spammers for search engine, rather than human, consumption, will typically be crammed full of the same search phrase, repeated over and over again. It won’t contain the related words.

A high-quality page (naturally written) will, by contrast, typically be full of words semantically related to the main search term used. As search engines move ever further toward employing semantic intelligence in their ranking systems, using related keywords will become ever more important to avoid scoring low in the rankings.

Perhaps more importantly, you should remember that the phrases you might use to search for something will not be the same phrases that someone else would naturally use, so some research is required. There is an excellent tool on the web for locating related keywords, the GoRank Ontology Finder (Related Keywords Lookup Tool). This tool runs a “related word” enquiry against the Google index. See www.gorank.com/seotools/ontology/. Visit the forum (www.seo-expert-services.co.uk) for more excellent tools like these. Try using an ontology tool (and an ordinary thesaurus) to identify some related terms. Your optimization campaign should ideally use a mixture of these words in both on-page and off-page activities.

Brad wants to explore related words for his important qualifying words “cheap” and “quality.” He uses both the GoRank Ontology Finder and Microsoft Word’s Thesaurus function and finds the following:

" Cheap: buy, cheap, discount, low cost, low priced, last minute, cheapest, bargain, cheaper, inexpensive, economical, affordable, cut-price, budget, reduced, inexpensive, on sale
" Quality: luxury, superior, class, value, five star, luxurious, high, highest

He adds suitable combinations of his main keywords and these qualifying words to the keywords list on his spreadsheet.

Often the words you find through an ontological check will actually be used more frequently by searchers than the ones you had originally selected.

Consider Doug Chalmers, purveyor of fine antiques in Windsor, UK. Doug specializes in “Victorian furnishings,” so (before reading this book) he was very set on ranking well for that particular keyphrase. However, a full related-word check revealed many alternatives – including old, classic, antique, furniture, vintage, rare, Victorian, antiques, and collectible – with “antique furniture” being the most attractive choice. Without an ontological check, he could have wasted a great deal of time and energy on too narrow a selection.

Tags:

About author

Curabitur at est vel odio aliquam fermentum in vel tortor. Aliquam eget laoreet metus. Quisque auctor dolor fermentum nisi imperdiet vel placerat purus convallis.

0 megjegyzés

Post a Comment